Introduction of Arthur Miller
Miller
was often in the public eye, particularly during the late 1940s, 1950s and
early 1960s. During this time, he was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Drama;
testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee;
and was married to Marilyn Monroe.
He received the Prince of Asturias Award and the Praemium Imperiale
prize in 2002 and the Jerusalem Prize in 2003,[2] as well as the Dorothy and
Lillian Gish Lifetime Achievement Award and the Pulitzer Prize
The major of the
play is the conflict between self-interest and the wider responsibility that
people owe to the society in which they live. This conflict is mostly enacted
through the characters of Joe, Chris, and the now-dead Larry.
Joe has put all his
energies into making money and building up his business. He was determined to
keep his factory production line running, even when it caused the deaths of twenty-one pilots through faulty airplane parts. At the end of Act Two, when
Chris realizes that Joe is responsible for the pilots’ deaths, Joe says he did
it for the business: “What could I do! I’m in business, a man is in business; a
hundred and twenty cracked, you’re out of business …”
In Joe’s mind, this is
not selfish, as he did everything for Chris: “Chris, I did it for you, it was a
chance and I took it for you.” Horrified, Chris demands, “Is that as far as
your mind can see, the business? … What the hell do you mean, you did it for
me?” In Chris’s view, people have a wider responsibility to mankind in general,
and to society:
“Don’t you have a country?
Don’t you live in the world?”
Joe has long convinced
himself that Larry was his practical son, with a head for business, and that
Chris was the impractical idealist. But he turns out to be wrong. It transpires
that Larry found out about Joe’s conviction for causing the deaths of the
pilots and could not live with the knowledge, and so committed suicide. Chris,
on the other hand, reveals in Act Three that he suspected all along that Joe
was guilty of the crime, but adopted a “practical” attitude and did not
confront him.
There is an implicit
contrast between the self-sacrifice of the men who died in the war, some of
them as a result of Joe’s factory’s faulty parts, and those who were looking
after their own interest, such as Joe. By association with Joe, Chris also becomes stained with corruption, as he took a salary from his father’s firm in
spite of his suspicions that the money was tainted with the blood of the dead
airmen.
Finally, in Act Three,
Joe has to confront the implications of his actions. In words that foreshadow
his end, he says of Chris, “I’m his father and he’s my son, and if there’s
something bigger than that I’ll put a bullet in my head!” As the play shows,
there is something bigger than that. So when Joe finally does face up to his
crime, he does the only thing he can morally do, which is to extinguish his
life. The sense of waste is overwhelming: not just of Joe’s life, but of all
the other lives that have been lost or torn apart because of the pursuit of
profit: the twenty-one airmen, Steve and the rest of the Deever family, Larry,
Chris, and Kate.
What is more, Joe’s
death is far from a resolution. Psychologists say that there is often an
element of revenge in a suicide, with the suicide placing his or her body for
maximum dramatic effect on the person who is deemed culpable. In All My Sons, Joe’s suicide carries a flavor of revenge on
those who have pushed him to face his crime: Kate, Chris, and Ann. Accordingly,
the curtain falls on Chris weeping with guilt over his father’s death, and
there is a sense that his guilt will hang like a shadow over the marriage
between him and Ann, if indeed it still takes place.
Thus the ramifications
of Joe’s crime do not end with his death, but go on indefinitely.
No comments:
Post a Comment